Skip to content

Kolmogorov continuity criteria

THE KOLMOGOROV CONTINUITY CRITERIA
Let X:R+d→SX : \mathbb{R}^d_+ \to S be a process on Rd\mathbb{R}^d with values in a complete metric space (S, ρ)(S, \, \rho) such that
E{ρ(Xs,Xt)}a≤c∣s−t∣d+b,s,t∈Rd,\begin{equation*}\mathbb{E} \left\{ \rho \left(X_s, X_t\right) \right\}^a \leq c|s-t|^{d+b}, \quad s, t \in \mathbb{R}^d,\end{equation*}
for some constants a,b>0a, b > 0. Then there exists a modification X~\tilde{X} of XX that is locally Hölder continuous of order pp, for every p∈(0,ba)p \in(0, \frac{b}{a}).
For example, one can show that Brownian motion is almost surely locally Hölder continuous of order pp, for every p∈(0,12)p \in(0, \frac{1}{2}).

Motivation

The fundamental motivation for Kolmogorov's continuity criterion is to provide a practical way to prove that random processes have continuous sample paths.
HÖLDER CONTINUOUS FUNCTION
A function ff on Euclidean space is called Hölder continuous if there are real constants C>0C > 0 and α>0\alpha > 0 such that for all xx and yy,
∣f(x)−f(y)∣≤C∥x−y∥α.\begin{equation*}|f(x) - f(y)| \leq C \|x - y\|^{\alpha}.\end{equation*}
Kolmogorov's insight was that instead of checking continuity directly, we could look at the moments of increments. For a process XtX_t, if we can show that for some p>0p > 0 and α>0\alpha > 0:
E{ρ(Xs,Xt)}a≤c∣s−t∣d+b,s,t∈Rd,\begin{equation*}\mathbb{E} \left\{ \rho \left(X_s, X_t\right) \right\}^a \leq c|s-t|^{d+b}, \quad s, t \in \mathbb{R}^d,\end{equation*}
Then under mild additional conditions, the process has a continuous modification.
This criterion is particularly valuable for Brownian motion B(t)B(t). We have:
E[∣B(t)−B(s)∣4]=3∣t−s∣2\begin{equation*}\mathbb{E}[|B(t) - B(s)|^4] = 3|t-s|^2\end{equation*}
Taking p=4p=4 and α=1\alpha=1, the criterion immediately gives continuity.

Proof of Kolmogorov continuity criteria

We consider the restriction of XX to [0,1]d[0,1]^d without the loss of generality and make proof for [0,1]d[0,1]^d. Then we build the approximation sets GnG_n and define the mapping
πn(u):[0,1]d→Gnsuch that∣πn(u)−u∣≤2−n\begin{equation*}\pi_n (u) : [0,1]^d \to G_n \quad \text{such that} \quad | \pi_n (u) - u | \leq 2^{-n}\end{equation*}

Construction approximation sequence

The set $G_3$in $[0, 1]^2$
The set G3G_3in [0,1]2[0, 1]^2
We can define the approximation dataset GnG_n of points [0,1]d[0, 1]^d such that the coordinates of 2nx2^n x are positive integers and ∣Gn∣=(2n+1)d| G_n | = (2^n + 1)^d. The for each u∈[0,1]du \in [0, 1]^d we choose πn(u)∈Gn\pi_n (u) \in G_n as close to uu as possible, so that
∣πn(u)−u∣≤2−n\begin{equation*}| \pi_n (u) - u | \leq 2^{-n}\end{equation*}
and
∣πn(u)−πn−1(u)∣≤∣πn(u)−u∣+∣u−πn−1(u)∣≤32n.\begin{equation*}|\pi_n (u) - \pi_{n-1} (u)| \leq | \pi_n (u) - u | + | u - \pi_{n-1} (u) | \leq \frac{3}{2^n}.\end{equation*}
Then consider the random variable
Yn=max⁡{ρ(Xs,Xt);∣s−t∣≤32n}\begin{equation*}Y_n = \max \left\{ \rho(X_s, X_t); \quad |s-t| \leq \frac{3}{2^n} \right\}\end{equation*}
and since Gn−1⊂GnG_{n-1} \subset G_n, we get ∀u∈[0,1]d\forall u \in [0,1]^d
∣πn(u)−πn−1(u)∣≤32n⇒ρ(Xπn(u),Xπn−1(u))≤Yn\begin{equation*}|\pi_n (u) - \pi_{n-1} (u)| \leq \frac{3}{2^n} \Rightarrow \rho(X_{\pi_{n}(u)}, X_{\pi_{n-1}(u)}) \leq Y_n\end{equation*}
For the set G=⋃n≥0GnG = \bigcup_{n\geq0} G_n we claim that
sup⁡s,t∈G;∣s−t∣≤2−kρ(Xs,Xt)≤3∑n≥kYn\begin{equation}\sup_{s, t \in G; \newline |s-t| \leq 2^{-k}} \rho(X_s, X_t) \leq 3 \sum_{n\geq k} Y_n\end{equation}
The set $G_4$in $[0, 1]^2$
The set G4G_4in [0,1]2[0, 1]^2
To prove this, consider n≥kn \geq k such that s,t∈Gns, t \in G_n, so that s=πn(s)s = \pi_n (s) and t=πn(t)t = \pi_n (t). Assuming ∣s−t∣≤2−k| s - t| \leq 2^{-k}, we have
∣πk(s)−πk(t)∣≤∣πk(u)−s∣+∣s−t∣+∣t−πk(t)∣≤32k\begin{equation*}|\pi_k (s) - \pi_{k} (t)| \leq | \pi_k (u) - s | + |s - t| + | t - \pi_k (t) | \leq \frac{3}{2^k}\end{equation*}
and thus
ρ(Xπk(s),Xπk(t))≤Yk\begin{equation*}\rho(X_{\pi_{k}(s)}, X_{\pi_k(t)}) \leq Y_k\end{equation*}
Next, for u∈{s,t}u \in \{ s, t \},
ρ(Xu,Xπk(u))=ρ(Xπn(u),Xπk(u))=∑k≤l≤nρ(Xπl+1(u),Xπl(u)),\begin{equation*}\rho(X_u, X_{\pi_k(u)}) = \rho(X_{\pi_{n}(u)}, X_{\pi_k(u)}) = \sum_{k \leq l \leq n} \rho(X_{\pi_{l+1}(u)}, X_{\pi_l(u)}),\end{equation*}
and since ρ(Xπl+1(u),Xπl(u))≤Yl+1\rho(X_{\pi_{l+1}(u)}, X_{\pi_l(u)}) \leq Y_{l+1}, we obtain
ρ(Xu,Xπk(u))≤∑l≥kYl+1\begin{equation*}\rho(X_u, X_{\pi_k(u)}) \leq \sum_{ l \geq k} Y_{l+1}\end{equation*}
We then use the previous inequalities and get
ρ(Xs,Xt)≤ρ(Xs,Xπk(s))+ρ(Xπk(s),Xπk(t))+ρ(Xπk(t),Xt)≤3∑l≥kYl+1\begin{equation*}\rho(X_s, X_t) \leq \rho(X_s, X_{\pi_k(s)}) + \rho(X_{\pi_k(s)}, X_{\pi_k(t)}) + \rho(X_{\pi_k(t)}, X_t) \leq 3 \sum_{ l \geq k} Y_{l+1}\end{equation*}

The inequality for maximum

The number of points on which we consider the maximum process YnY_n can be bounded as follows:
∣{(s,t)∈Gn ⁣:∣s−t∣≤32n}∣≤3d2nd\begin{equation*}\left| \left\{(s,t) \in G_n \colon |s-t| \leq \frac{3}{2^n} \right\} \right| \leq 3^d 2^{nd}\end{equation*}
Then using Chebyshev inequality and condition (1):
P{Yn>12pn}=P{⋃(s,t)∈Gn∣s−t∣≤32−n{ρ(Xs,Xt)>12pn}}≤∑(s,t)∈Gn∣s−t∣≤32−nP{ρ(Xs,Xt)>12pn}=∑(s,t)∈Gn∣s−t∣≤32−nP{ρ(Xs,Xt)a>12pna}≤C(d)2n(pa−b).\begin{align*}\mathbb{P} \left\{ Y_n > \frac{1}{2^{pn}}\right\}&= \mathbb{P} \left\{\bigcup_{\substack{(s,t) \in G_n \\ |s-t| \leq 3 2^{-n}}}\left\{\rho(X_s, X_t) > \frac{1}{2^{pn}}\right\}\right\} \\&\leq \sum_{\substack{(s,t) \in G_n \\ |s-t| \leq 3 2^{-n}}}\mathbb{P} \left\{\rho(X_s, X_t) > \frac{1}{2^{pn}}\right\} \\&= \sum_{\substack{(s,t) \in G_n \\ |s-t| \leq 3 2^{-n}}}\mathbb{P} \left\{\rho(X_s, X_t)^a > \frac{1}{2^{pna}}\right\} \leq C(d) 2^{n(pa - b)}.\end{align*}
where the constant C(d)C(d) depends only on dd.
If we choose p∈(0,ba)p \in (0, \frac{b}{a})
∑n=1∞P{Yn≥12pn}<∞\begin{equation*}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \mathbb{P} \left\{ Y_n \geq \frac{1}{2^{pn}} \right\} < \infty\end{equation*}
By Borel-Cantelli Lemma, we get that ∃N0 ∀n≥N0 ⁣:Yn≤2−pn \exists N_0 \, \forall n \geq N_0 \colon Y_n \leq 2^{-p n} a.s. This implies convergence of the series ∑n≥0Yn\sum_{n\geq0} Y_n a.s.

Hölder continuous of XX

Thus
sup⁡{ρ(Xs,Xt) ⁣:s,t∈G,∣s−t∣≤2−m}≤3∑n≥mYn≤3∑n≥m2−pn≤2−pm1−2−p\begin{equation}\sup \left\{ \rho(X_s, X_t) \colon s, t \in G, |s-t| \leq 2^{-m} \right\} \leq 3 \sum_{n\geq m} Y_n \leq 3 \sum_{n\geq m} 2^{-pn} \leq \frac{2^{-pm}}{1 - 2^{-p}}\end{equation}
showing that XX is a.s. Hölder continuous on GG of order pp.
In particular,
XX agrees a.s. on ⋃nDn\bigcup_n \mathcal{D}_n with a continuous process X~\tilde{X} on [0,1]d[0,1]^d, and we note that the Hölder continuity of X~\tilde{X} on GG extends with the same order pp to the entire cube [0,1]d[0,1]^d. \newline To show that X~\tilde{X} is a version of XX, fix any t∈[0,1]dt \in[0,1]^d, and choose t1,t2,…∈Gt_1, t_2, \ldots \in G with tn→tt_n \rightarrow t. Then Xtn=X~tnX_{t_n}=\tilde{X}_{t_n} a.s. for each nn. Since also Xtn→PXtX_{t_n} \stackrel{\mathbb{P}}{\rightarrow} X_t by (1) and X~tn→X~t\tilde{X}_{t_n} \rightarrow \tilde{X}_t a.s. by continuity, we get Xt=X~tX_t=\tilde{X}_t a.s.

References

  • [Durrett2019]Durrett, Rick. Probability: Theory and Examples. Fifth edition. Cambridge University Press, 2019. PDF.
  • [Billingsley2012]Billingsley, Patrick. Probability and Measure. Anniversary edition. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.